Your selection
Nothing selected yet.
D1 badge

AS-IS Mapping

Used in STEP 4
A glimpse inside
Preview of the D1 worked example — structure and colouring shown, detail deliberately softened
3 tabs: Cover · blank tool · Meridian worked example. One row per process stage with owner, systems, hand-offs, rework, touch and elapsed time and a severity-rated risk; the baseline totals and flow efficiency at the foot calculate themselves.

In a sentence — map how one priority service actually works today — stage by stage, system by system — and produce the touch-time, elapsed-time and risk baseline everything else measures against.

£45 + VAT Buy now or Get all 11 tools, discounted →

What this tool does

Most transformations start arguing about the future before anyone agrees what's actually happening today. This tool forces that conversation first: one row per stage, the real systems, the real hand-offs, the real waiting time — not the version that shows up in a process diagram nobody's checked against reality.

The baseline totals at the foot build themselves from the rows above, so total touch time, total elapsed time, flow efficiency and the count of high-severity risks are always a live reflection of what's actually in the sheet, not a number someone typed in once and forgot to update. Flow efficiency under roughly 15% is normal for a process that hasn't been redesigned yet — that's the finding this baseline exists to expose, not a sign the sheet is wrong; north of 40% is genuinely strong for admin-type work.

WHY THIS HELPS

Touch time and elapsed time are tracked separately. A stage can look fast on paper — low touch time — while the real gap sits in the elapsed time: hours or days spent waiting for someone else to pick it up. Splitting the two is what makes the eventual ‘quick win’ actually quick.

READING THE BASELINE

Touch time and elapsed time use exactly the same unit — set once for the whole sheet (hours, in the worked example). Flow efficiency is simply touch time divided by elapsed time: the share of the total time that was actually being worked, rather than sitting in a queue or waiting on someone else. As a rule of thumb, under about 15% is typical for an unreformed back-office process — that's not a mistake in the sheet, it's the opportunity this baseline exists to expose. 25–40% is a well-run process; above about 40% is genuinely strong for admin-type work. The worked example above comes out around 8%, which is normal for a process that hasn't been redesigned yet.

What's included

D1 · AS-IS Mapping — the blank tool

Ready to complete for your own engagement. Blue-tinted cells are for you to fill in.

Worked example

The same tool completed end to end, using the fictional Meridian Wealth Management scenario — see what ‘done’ looks like before you start your own.

How it's used

A quick walkthrough of the sheet:

Using this tool
1Pick one priority service and map it in sequence — one row per stage, one stage at a time.
2Name every system touched and every hand-off between teams; flag any rework loop where work gets sent back.
3Set your timing unit once, then log touch time (active work) and elapsed time (door-to-door, including waits) for each stage.
4Record the operational-risk issue each stage exposes and rate its severity — High risk highlights itself automatically.
5Check the baseline totals at the foot before moving on — they're built from your rows, not typed in separately.
Matches the sheet's own columns exactly: Stage, Activity, Owner, System(s), Hand-offs, Rework loops, Touch time, Elapsed time, Operational risk issue, Severity.

Need the full method, not just one step?

All eleven instruments — D1 through D10 and the Prioritisation Matrix — at a discount against buying them separately.

See the full toolkit →