Prioritisation Matrix

Used in PART 2 · PRIORITISATION COUNCIL

A glimpse inside

Preview of the PM worked example — structure and colouring shown, detail deliberately softened

8 tabs: Cover · quick quadrant · criteria & weights · scoring matrix · charts · three Meridian worked-example tabs. The fast value-by-effort quadrant with its execution-risk flag, and beneath it the weighted model's benefit-versus-complexity plot — one point per initiative, drawn from the scoring tab's own numbers.

In a sentence — triage fast with a value-versus-effort quadrant, or run the full weighted model when the stakes and the competing claims are higher.

£85 + VAT Buy now or Get all 12, discounted →

Sold under the Optimize10 Toolkit Licence Terms, which you will be asked to accept at checkout. The licence covers use within the purchasing organisation only. Buying for more than one company in a group, or for consulting or training work? Contact us.

What this tool does

Not every prioritisation call deserves the same amount of process. This instrument gives you both ends of that spectrum in one file — a same-session quadrant for a fast first pass, and a fully weighted, criteria-based model for the portfolio conversation with real disagreement in the room. Value should reflect real strategic contribution — a constraint removed, a risk closed, a genuine cost or revenue impact — not how loudly a sponsor wants it; Effort should reflect genuine delivery effort, not enthusiasm to get started.

The two tiers are designed to be used together, not as alternatives: run the quadrant first to triage quickly, then bring the handful of genuinely contested initiatives into the weighted model, where the working can actually be shown. The worked example includes a case where the quadrant puts two initiatives in the same bucket and the weighted model ranks them first and last once complexity is weighted honestly — seeing why is worth the five minutes it takes.

WHY THIS HELPS

Benefit and complexity are never collapsed into one score. It's tempting to net everything down to a single number; keeping the two axes separate is what lets a mandatory, high-complexity initiative stay visible as mandatory, instead of disappearing because its net score looks unfavourable.

READING THE TWO VIEWS TOGETHER

Weighted Benefit and weighted Complexity are each a weight-adjusted average, not a sum — they land back on the same 0–4 scale you scored against, so a weighted Benefit of 3.2 reads directly against the same anchor text you'd use to score an individual criterion. Net priority is simply Benefit minus Complexity, so it can go negative — that's not a bug, it's the model telling you complexity outweighs benefit once everything is weighted honestly. This is where the two tiers earn their place together. The quadrant can only sort initiatives into four buckets, so two high-value initiatives can land side by side as ‘Strategic bets’ even when one is far harder to deliver than the other. The weighted model separates them: once cost, delivery risk and resourcing are each scored against agreed weights, rather than folded into a single Effort guess, one can rise to the top of the list while the other falls to the bottom. Use the quadrant to triage; use the weighted model to decide between the initiatives the quadrant can’t tell apart.

What's included

PM · Prioritisation Matrix — the blank tool

Both tiers, ready to complete: the quick quadrant and the full weighted model.

Worked example

Both tiers completed end to end against six Meridian Wealth Management candidate initiatives — including the case where the two tiers tell different stories.

How it's used

A quick walkthrough of the sheet:

Using this tool

1Start with the quick quadrant — score each initiative's Value and Effort 1–5; the quadrant call is automatic.

2Set Execution risk (Low/Medium/High) alongside it — High is flagged regardless of which quadrant the initiative lands in.

3For anything genuinely contested, move to the weighted model: agree criteria and relative weights first, before any scoring happens.

4Score every initiative 0–4 against each criterion — the model computes weighted Benefit, Complexity and Net priority automatically.

5Read a negative Net priority as a steer to descope or rethink, not an automatic no — a mandatory item can still score negative and remain non-negotiable.

Two tiers, one file: quick quadrant (Initiative, Value, Effort, Execution risk, Quadrant, Notes) and the weighted model (Criteria & weights, Scoring matrix, Charts).